Saye v. Pieschacon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “despite the lack of a final judgment on the issue of liability,” an appeal of a fee award could proceed since the award was final and “independently appealable”
• “This court has held that premature appeals should be dismissed without prejudice to the appealing party’s right to timely file a notice of appeal after the trial court has rendered an appealable final order”
• “[T]he order awarding attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant to the offer of judgment statute, must be reversed because such an award requires the entry of a final judgment on the issue of liability, or its equivalent, in order to trigger entitlement under the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).