Say & Say, Inc. v. Ebershoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a court may disregard the corporate entity and treat the acts as if they were done by the individuals themselves of by the controlling corporation where the corporate form is used to accomplish a wrongful purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. Kuei
  N.D. California· 2001-11-19· cited 183×
• Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water Agency
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-07-28· cited 31×
• Say & Say v. Castellano
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-01-31· cited 13×
• In Re Liang-Houh Shieh
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-10-07· cited 13×
• Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Ass'n
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-06-23· cited 6×
• People v. Carlos V.
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-08-29· cited 2×
• Stanwyck v. Beilinson
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-28· cited 1×
• In Re Carlos
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-08-29
• Santa Clarita Org. for Planning etc. v. Castaic Lake Water Agency
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-08-16
• Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assn.
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-06-23
• United Computer Systems, Inc. v. At & T Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-09-02