Skip to main content
· 9/8/1964

Saxton v. Harris

Citations

  • 395 P.2d 71
  • 1964 Alas. LEXIS 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the party who drafts inconsistent jury instructions cannot complain about the inconsistency on appeal
  • a general objection to a failure to give certain of defendant’s proposed instructions, without specifying reasons, held not to satisfy requirements of equivalent civil rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbett, Dimond, Arend

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.