Saxton v. Capital One Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Beneficial Nat’l Bank as being grounded in the federal interest that protects national banks from state taxation
• “It is clear to the court that it is not the per se amount of late fees or other ‘interest’ that plaintiffs challenge here but rather the allegedly improper and deceptive manner in which it was charged. Hence, plaintiffs’ complaint is not construable as a claim for usury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).