Saxlehner v. Siegel-Cooper Co.
Citations
- 179 U.S. 42
- 21 S. Ct. 16
- 45 L. Ed. 77
- 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1841
Syllabus
<p>These eases were argued with No. 29, ante, 40. The answer in them was substantially the same as in that ease, and the same record of proofs was used. Held that an injunction should issue against' all the defendants, but as the Siegel-Cooper Company acted in good faith it should not be required to account for gains and profits.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that one defendant \should not be required to account for gains and profits\ when it \appear[ed] to have acted in good faith\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.