Skip to main content
· 5/14/1913

Sawdey v. Barnes

Citations

  • 73 Wash. 526
  • 132 P. 225
  • 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1632

Syllabus

<p>Attorney and Client — Settlement of Suit — Fraud—Evidence— Sufficiency. The evidence is insufficient to sustain a finding that an attorney in making a settlement for his client with a railroad company defrauded him by misrepresenting the amount of money received, and converted the same, where it appears that the check and voucher, relied upon to show that the attorney received the money, was presented to the attorney in blank, he did not learn of its recitals until long afterwards, and did not cash the check, which was returned to the person who brought it to him and receipted for prior to its approval by the auditor of the company, and was cashed by other parties.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is elementary . . . that the laws of this state . . . enter into and become a part of the articles of incorporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.