Savoy Construction Co. v. Atchison & Keller, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiff’s version of facts justified a suit for conversion, because the evidence can support a finding that defendant unlawfully possessed plaintiff’s property, and plaintiff’s employee testified that he requested and was refused return of the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).