Save the Valley, Inc. v. Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff organizations had associational standing after noting two dozen states that have accepted the doctrine of associational standing
• concluding individual members would have standing because they would be “adversely affected” by grant of landfill permit
• concluding individual members would have standing because they would be \adversely affected\ by grant of landfill permit
• concluding third element met because plaintiffs “only sought review of the granting of a permit and not an award of monetary damages, which would have required individualized proof’
• “[Citizens Groups] argue that they had standing to petition for administrative review of the granting of IKEC’s petition under the doctrine of associational standing. [IKEC] respond[s] that [AOPA] does not give [it] standing to petition for administrative review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).