Save the Bay, Inc. v. Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specifying procedure for review of state programs leading to judicial review by Court of Appeals.
• expressing “some skepticism whether a state authority’s unsatisfactory handling of a single permit would ever warrant [the] EPA’s revocation of NPDES authority, much less judicial reversal of a decision not to revoke”
• noting similar feature of the Clean Water Act pollutant dis- charge program as support for concluding that EPA decision not to veto a permit was committed to agency discretion and therefore not subject to judicial review
• noting similar feature of the Clean Water Act pollutant dis- charge program as support for concluding that EPA decision not to veto a permit was committed to agency discretion and therefore not subject to judicial review
• EPA's refusal to object to state-issued permit not reviewable under section 509(b)(1)(F)
• EPA’s refusal to object to state-issued permit not reviewable under section 509(b)(1)(F)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).