Skip to main content
· 8/26/1997

Save Power Limited v. Syntek Finance Corp

Citations

  • 121 F.3d 947
  • 1997 WL 525425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “complete identity of parties is not required for dismissal or transfer of a case filed subsequently to a substantially related action.”
  • holding that “complete identity of parties is not required for dismissal or transfer of a case filed subsequently to a substantially related action.”
  • holding district court's failure to transfer case was an abuse of discretion when there was “substantial overlap” between it and the first-filed case
  • holding district court's failure to transfer case was an abuse of discretion when there was “substantial overlap” between it and the first-filed case
  • “Complete identity of parties is not required for dismissal or transfer of a case filed subsequently to a substantially related action.”
  • “Complete identity of parties is not required for dismissal or transfer of a case filed subsequently to a substantially related action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, King, Duplantier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.