Save Our Streets v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proposed amendment to prohibit the use of county funds for speed bumps was not charter material
• holding that proposed amendment to prohibit the use of county funds for speed bumps was not charter material
• recognizing that the Smallwood court relied on such a distinction
• recognizing that the Smallwood court relied on such a distinction
• stating that the content of a charter amendment \cannot transcend its limited office and be made to serve or function as a vehicle through which to adopt local legislation\
• stating that the content of a charter amendment “cannot transcend its limited office and be made to serve or function as a vehicle through which to adopt local legislation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).