Save Columbia CU Committee v. Columbia Community Credit Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Wicks to conclude no right to inspect records, given the state’s “extensive regulatory oversight” and fundamental differences between credit union members and corporate shareholders
• describing permissible extrinsic evidence as “the circumstances surrounding contract formation, the subsequent acts and conduct of the parties, and the reasonableness of the parties’ respective interpretations”
• describing permissible extrinsic evidence as “the circumstances surrounding contract formation, the subsequent acts and conduct of the parties, and the reasonableness of the parties’ respective interpretations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).