Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/17/1985
Save Charleston Foundation v. Murray
Citations
- 333 S.E.2d 60
- 286 S.C. 170
- 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding conversion of promissory note and bringing action on note not sufficient
- stating the conduct of converting a promissory note and then maliciously bringing an action based on the note did not \exceed[] all possible bounds of decency\
- “When an identical set of facts entitle the plaintiff to alternative remedies, he may plead and prove his entitlement to either or both; however, the plaintiff may not recover both.”
- doctrine of election of remedies involves a choice between two or more different and coexisting modes of procedure and relief afforded by law for the same injury; plaintiff may plead and prove either or both but must elect so as not to receive a double recovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Cureton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-07-26· cited 79×
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-03-08· cited 60×
- Harper v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-09-02· cited 50×
- Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-28· cited 36×
- Folkens v. HuntCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-25· cited 33×
- Butts v. AVX CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-27· cited 19×
- Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-10-22· cited 18×
- Cowart v. PooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 17×
- Adams v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-08· cited 16×
- Gattison v. S.C. State CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-03-13· cited 16×
- Sorin Equipment Co. v. Firm, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-08· cited 15×
- McTeer v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceD. South Carolina· 1989-02-03· cited 11×
- Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.S.D. Iowa· 1994-11-09· cited 10×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Employee Resource Management, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2001-03-29· cited 10×
- Enhance-It, L.L.C. v. American Access Technologies, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2006-01-23· cited 9×
- Minyard Enterprises, Inc. v. Southeastern Chemical & Solvent Co.Fourth Circuit· 1999-07-13· cited 9×
- Brown v. FelkelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 8×
- Tomlinson v. MixonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 6×
- Oaks At Rivers Edge Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Daniel Island Riverside Developers, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-08-02· cited 6×
- Smith v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-03-07· cited 4×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-25· cited 128×
- Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-05-13· cited 100×
- Owens v. Andrews Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-11-20· cited 43×
- Jones v. Atlanta-Charlotte Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-02-15· cited 38×
- Eaves v. Broad River Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-03-11· cited 32×
- Baeza v. Robert E. Lee Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1983-11-28· cited 24×
- Cisson v. Pickens Savings and Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-02-16· cited 22×
- Rimer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-05-31· cited 19×
- Robert Harmon and Bore, Inc. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-05-07· cited 17×
- Walker v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1926-02-03· cited 17×
- Gulledge v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-04-23· cited 14×
- Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-10-23· cited 13×
- Carrigg v. BlueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-11-16· cited 13×
- Bell v. Dixie Furniture CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-22· cited 12×
- Stanley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-03-16· cited 10×
- Skinner & Ruddock, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-03-01· cited 8×
- Smart v. Charleston Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-11-17· cited 7×
- Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-10· cited 7×
- Lancaster v. Smithco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-03-14· cited 5×
- Russell v. RisherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-12-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.