Skip to main content
· 6/17/1985

Save Charleston Foundation v. Murray

Citations

  • 333 S.E.2d 60
  • 286 S.C. 170
  • 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding conversion of promissory note and bringing action on note not sufficient
  • stating the conduct of converting a promissory note and then maliciously bringing an action based on the note did not \exceed[] all possible bounds of decency\
  • “When an identical set of facts entitle the plaintiff to alternative remedies, he may plead and prove his entitlement to either or both; however, the plaintiff may not recover both.”
  • doctrine of election of remedies involves a choice between two or more different and coexisting modes of procedure and relief afforded by law for the same injury; plaintiff may plead and prove either or both but must elect so as not to receive a double recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Cureton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.