Savard v. Rhode Island

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining how the factual circumstances of Swain and Arruda were reasonably distinguishable from that case
• setting forth factors to be considered by the Court when determining whether to strike untimely discovery materials
• separately defining \visual body cavity searches” as \inspections of the anal and genital areas.”
• plaintiff need not show that “materially indistinguishable conduct has previously been found unlawful”
• defining strip searches as “visual inspections of the naked body”
• “The constitutional line that sepa- rates permissible from impermissible uses of these methods is imprecise and context-specific . . . . [P]lotting that line requires a determination of what is reasonable under a given set of circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).