First Circuit· 8/4/2003

Savard v. Rhode Island

Citations

338 F.3d 23
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15515
2003 WL 21782348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining how the factual circumstances of Swain and Arruda were reasonably distinguishable from that case
setting forth factors to be considered by the Court when determining whether to strike untimely discovery materials
separately defining \visual body cavity searches” as \inspections of the anal and genital areas.”
plaintiff need not show that “materially indistinguishable conduct has previously been found unlawful”
defining strip searches as “visual inspections of the naked body”
“The constitutional line that sepa- rates permissible from impermissible uses of these methods is imprecise and context-specific . . . . [P]lotting that line requires a determination of what is reasonable under a given set of circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Coffin, Bownes, Torruella, Selya, Lynch, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Savard v. Rhode Island

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.