Savage v. State
Citations
- 18 Fla. 970
Syllabus
<p>1. Fractions of days are not regarded in law, except when justice requires a careful examination as to the precise time of day at which an act was performed, in order to do right as between parties.</p> <p>2. Where time is to be computed from a particular day, or when an act is to be performed within a specified period, as from or after a day named, the rule is to exclude the first day designated, and to include the last day of the specified period.</p> <p>3. An indictment found on the thirteenth day of December, 1880, for ' an offence alleged to have been committed on the thirteenth day of December, 1878, is good, the offence not being barred by the statute of limitations.</p> <p>■4. It is not necessary that the court should charge the jury in the precise language adoi>ted by the counsel for the defendant in his request, but it is sufficient if it charge the propositions of law so submitted in equivalent language of its own adoption.</p>
Judges: Vanvalkenburgh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-05-10· cited 48×
- Simmons v. HanneSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 34×
- Croissant v. DeSoto Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1924-06-02· cited 20×
- Velazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-06· cited 13×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-06-15· cited 8×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-21· cited 7×
- State v. Town of Winter ParkSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-01-15· cited 7×
- Di Stefano v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-03-07· cited 5×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.