Skip to main content
· 2/27/1900

Savage v. City of Springfield

Citations

  • 83 Mo. App. 323
  • 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when cross motions for summary judgment have been filed, the court assumes there is no evidence to consider which has not already been filed by the parties
  • explaining that when cross motions for summary judgment have been filed, the court assumes there is no evidence to consider which has not already been filed by the parties
  • explaining that when cross motions for summary judgment have been filed, the court assumes there is no evidence to consider which has not already been filed by the parties to the case
  • explaining that when cross motions for summary judgment have been filed, the court assumes there is no evidence to consider which has not already been filed by the parties to the case
  • noting the court may decline to address the merits of a question when appellant provides no legal authority regarding the particular argument
  • \The purpose of summary judgment is to expedite the disposition of cases not requiring the services of a fact finder.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.