Savage & Associates, P.C. v. Mandl (In Re Teligent, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is “well-settled law in this district that § 542(b) cannot be used to recover a disputed pre-petition debt”
• holding that it is “well-settled law in this district that § 542(b) cannot be used to recover a disputed pre-petition debt”
• stating that “section 542(b) only applies to undisputed, liquidated claims”
• simply stating that fraudulently or preferentially transferred property is not property of the estate until it is recovered for purposes of turnover, neither of which are alleged here
• in case dealing with turnover of property that was the subject of a contested avoidance action, the court found that Section 542(a) was not applicable until the transfer was avoided, and that Section 542(b) did not apply to disputed debts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).