SAUZ v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the detective “was engaged in the lawful execution of a legal duty because she was investigating the lewd battery” but nonetheless reversing because “while Sauz provided patently false information to [the detective], he did so at a time when he was not lawfully detained”
• officer “was engaged in the lawful execution of a legal duty because she was investigating the lewd battery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).