Saur v. Probes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing former MCL 330.1700, which defined “recipient” in a substantially similar way to present MCL 330.1100c[12]
• construing former MCL 330.1700, which defined “recipient” in a substantially similar way to present MCL 330.1100c[12]
• construing former MCL 330.1700, which defined \recipient\ in a substantially similar way to present MCL 330.1100c[12]
• the standard of care owed to a client in a professional relationship may be imposed by statute, common law, or in accordance with a professional code of responsibility
• the privilege does cover psychiatrists, who are physicians
• the privilege does cover psychiatrists, who are physicians

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).