Saunders v. Town of Kingston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “semantic difference” between the probable cause standard and the “articulable and reasonable grounds” are, when balancing the underlying interests, a “distinction without a difference”
• noting that a conditional approval imposing only conditions subsequent constitutes a final decision appealable under RSA 677:15, I
• explaining that questions explicitly decided or decided by necessary inference by this court constitute the law of the case and are not ordinarily reexamined in the same case upon a subsequent appeal
• “The question decided on the first appeal is known as the law of the case, and becomes binding precedent to be followed in successive stages of the same litigation.” (quotation omitted)
• describing the law of the case doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).