Saunders v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not prohibit the trial court’s finding that appellant qualified as an habitual felony offender. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 791 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dinkens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-13· cited 10×
• Humiston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-20· cited 2×
• Pride v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-28· cited 1×
• Wachsmuth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-10· cited 54×
• Campbell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-22· cited 5×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-14· cited 1×