Saunders v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying prohibition and noting that no mechanism exists where a defendant can force a court to timely dispose of a VOP, and the failure to do so does not deprive the court of jurisdiction
• “[W]e know of no mechanism by which [the defendant] can force the trial court to timely dispose of the violation of probation nor does the trial court’s failure to have done so deprive it of jurisdiction.”
• “Although we are sympathetic to [the petitioner’s] situation, we deny the petition [for writ of prohibition] because we know of no mechanism by which he can force the trial court to timely dispose of the violation of probation....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-19· cited 11×
• Norman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-22· cited 6×
• McIntosh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-27· cited 3×
• Burgess v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-16· cited 1×
• DeLuca v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-03· cited 1×
• EDWARD BODIFORD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-21
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-13· cited 11×
• Irby v. State of Mo.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-02· cited 7×