Saunders v. Saunders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is manifest that the Statute here involved, requiring the revelation of a prior divorce, exists for the purpose of protecting innocent parties from being deceived . . . . Thus, the right of the ‘innocent party’ to repudiate the marriage under 13 Del. C. § 101(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Husband v. Wife
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1969-09-17· cited 9×
• Wilmington Trust Company v. Hahn
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1968-04-17· cited 6×
• Wronald S.B. v. Irina P.B.
  Delaware Family Court· 2000-04-19· cited 1×
• Wronald Sb v. Irina Pb
  Delaware Family Court· 2000-04-19
• S.B. v. P.B.
  Delaware Family Court· 2000-04-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anonymous v. Anonymous
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1951-12-11· cited 28×
• In Re Goldstein
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1951-12-20· cited 22×
• Williams v. Williams
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1922-09-18· cited 18×
• Doe v. Doe
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1933-02-21· cited 10×
• Williamson v. Williamson
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1954-01-05· cited 6×
• Deangelis v. U. S. A. C. Transport, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1954-05-27· cited 6×
• Saint Stanislaus Kostka Church v. Mayor of Wilmington
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1954-05-25· cited 4×
• Fluharty v. Fluharty
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1937-06-04· cited 4×