Saunders v. Michigan Avenue National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a footnote stating prior complaints were attached to preserve dismissed claims for appeal was effective
• stating that the defendant’s conduct must “be so oppressive as to leave the consumer with little alternative but to submit”
• holding that the plaintiff preserved for review allegations in her second amended complaint where a footnote in the third amended complaint provided that “ ‘[t]he prior complaints are attached as Appendix A to preserve the previously dismissed claim [szc] for appeal’ ”
• holding that the plaintiff preserved for review allegations in her second amended complaint where a footnote in the third amended complaint provided that \ '[t]he prior complaints are attached as Appendix A to preserve the previously dismissed claim [sic] for appeal' \
• finding that $20.00 overdraft fee was not unfair because plaintiff had con- trol over whether she would be assessed the fee and was free to select another bank
• finding conduct not oppressive when the plaintiff had control over whether she was to be assessed an overdraft fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).