Saunders v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that photographs introduced for the purpose of illustrating a witness’ testimony do not constitute substantive evidence in the case
• referring to this statutoiy provision as codification of the alternative “independent silent witness theory of admissibility of photographs” adopted by the Virginia Supreme Court in Ferguson v. Commonwealth, 212 Va. 745, 187 S.E.2d 189(1972)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anderson v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-05-11· cited 174×
• Antonio Hall, a/k/a Antonio Barrow v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-11-10
• Commonwealth v. Poe
  Norfolk County Circuit Court· 2015-08-17

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ferguson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1972-03-06· cited 46×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Futrell
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1968-09-06· cited 21×