Skip to main content
· 12/15/1857

Saunders v. Carroll

Citations

  • 12 La. Ann. 793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that military judge did not abuse his discre- tion in admitting hair evidence even where there was no ev- idence showing error rate for hair-analysis procedure
  • finding that military judge did not abuse his discre- tion in admitting hair evidence even where there was no ev- idence showing error rate for hair-analysis procedure
  • describing the detailed inquiry conducted by the military judge prior to admitting evidence of novel scientific evidence testing the presence of cocaine through hair analysis
  • describing the detailed inquiry conducted by the military judge prior to admitting evidence of novel scientific evidence testing the presence of cocaine through hair analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spofeohd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.