· 12/15/1857
Saunders v. Carroll
Citations
- 12 La. Ann. 793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that military judge did not abuse his discre- tion in admitting hair evidence even where there was no ev- idence showing error rate for hair-analysis procedure
- finding that military judge did not abuse his discre- tion in admitting hair evidence even where there was no ev- idence showing error rate for hair-analysis procedure
- describing the detailed inquiry conducted by the military judge prior to admitting evidence of novel scientific evidence testing the presence of cocaine through hair analysis
- describing the detailed inquiry conducted by the military judge prior to admitting evidence of novel scientific evidence testing the presence of cocaine through hair analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spofeohd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.