Skip to main content

Sauls v. Freeman

Citations

  • 24 Fla. 225

Syllabus

<p>1. A petition for a rehearing which suggests nothing that has not been fully considered by the court in making its decision, should be denied.</p> <p>2. A petition for a rehearing which is either a reargument of points made in the briefs and argument of the cause, or which assumes any new ground or position not taken before, is a violation of Supreme Court Rule 24 regulating the practice as to such petitions.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.