Saul v. Rowan Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that air conditioning contractor could not recover for services provided where the contractor was unli- censed at the time he entered into contract and performed work, in violation of the refrigeration/air conditioning services licensing statute
• holding contractor barred from recovery because he contracted and performed work without license
• holding contractor barred from recovery because he contracted and performed work without license
• holding contractor barred from recovery because he contracted and performed work without license
• \perceiv[ing] a clear distinction between [the company president's] individual license and the type of license which [the contracting company] was required to obtain before contracting or performing the work involved\
• \This jurisdiction has held consistently that a contract entered in violation of a licensing statute or regulation directed at protecting the public is void and unenforceable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).