Saul v. JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T. MacARTHUR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• portion of doctor's notes, recounting that accident victim was injured due to a fall caused by catching the heel of her shoe in the carpet, was inadmissible because it was not relevant to treatment of her injuries
• whether the plaintiff tripped and fell because she caught her heel on the floor due to the defendant's negligence in leveling an elevator or because she caught her heel in the hallway carpet was \not relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of her shoulder\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).