Skip to main content
· 4/10/2024

Saul Cimbler, etc. v. Rebecca Greemberg, etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant was CEO of oil and gas drilling business who solicited investment funds from passive investors who entrusted him with the task of completing the drilling project
  • ”[T]he note suggests that this enhancement is designed to apply where a defendant knowingly or recklessly exploits a victim’s vulnerability in order to facilitate his commission of the crime.”
  • “[T]he court did not base its finding of [the victim’s] vulnerability merely on broad, unsupported generalizations .... [The victim] testified at length at the sentencing hearing, and, based on his testimony, the court made express, specific findings as to his particular susceptibility....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.