· 2/3/2012
Sauer v. United States Department of Education
Citations
- 668 F.3d 644
- 25 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1575
- 2012 WL 336134
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “an arbitration panel is composed of members ap- pointed by the parties to the arbitration, not of Department of Education officials”
- noting that “an arbitration panel is composed of members ap- pointed by the parties to the arbitration, not of Department of Education officials”
- noting that “an arbitration panel is composed of members ap- pointed by the parties to the arbitration, not of Department of Education officials”
- “An arbitration decision under the [RSA] is ‘subject to appeal and review as a final agency action’ under the standards set forth in the [APA].” (quoting 20 U.S.C. § 107d-2(a)
- “An arbitration decision under the [RSA] is ‘subject to appeal and review as a final agency action’ under the standards set forth in the [APA].” (quoting 20 U.S.C. § 107d-2(a))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Gould, Ikuta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.