Skip to main content
· 2/3/2012

Sauer v. United States Department of Education

Citations

  • 668 F.3d 644
  • 25 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1575
  • 2012 WL 336134
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “an arbitration panel is composed of members ap- pointed by the parties to the arbitration, not of Department of Education officials”
  • noting that “an arbitration panel is composed of members ap- pointed by the parties to the arbitration, not of Department of Education officials”
  • noting that “an arbitration panel is composed of members ap- pointed by the parties to the arbitration, not of Department of Education officials”
  • “An arbitration decision under the [RSA] is ‘subject to appeal and review as a final agency action’ under the standards set forth in the [APA].” (quoting 20 U.S.C. § 107d-2(a)
  • “An arbitration decision under the [RSA] is ‘subject to appeal and review as a final agency action’ under the standards set forth in the [APA].” (quoting 20 U.S.C. § 107d-2(a))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Gould, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.