Sauer Ex Rel. Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming directed verdict for defense when no one witnessed collision between motorcycles and individuals involved did not remember what happened
• affirming directed verdict because plaintiff’s case was “based upon speculation and conjecture” and because the possibility “[t]hat [plaintiff’s] negligence alone caused his injuries [was] equally as plausible as the [plaintiff’s] charge that [defendant] was at fault”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).