Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Exxon has alleged that it is a third-party beneficiary of the Joint Venture Agreements; that is sufficient at this stage in the litigation.”
• “SABIC also purposefully availed itself of the protection of the U.S. laws by filing the NJ-I and Delaware actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).