Saucedo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Appellant raises several issues which may be suitable for consideration on appeal of his conviction.\
• court would not consider appeal from judgment on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus where appellant had adequate remedy at law to raise his contentions on direct appeal from his conviction
• \Appellant raises several issues which may be suitable for consideration on appeal of his conviction.\
• defendant’s appeal from trial court’s order denying pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus rendered moot by defendant’s conviction because defendant no longer confined based on process underlying his original detention and was then confined pursuant to judgment of conviction and sentence
• “Since habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy, ordinarily an application for writ of habeas corpus should not be entertained where there is an adequate remedy at law. . . . [Defendant] has an adequate remedy at law in that his contentions may be raised on direct appeal of his convictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).