Sattler v. Northwest Tissue Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since the parties put forth evidence of differing versions of the same consent conversation, a fact-finder was necessary to determine exactly who said what
• reversing summary judgment because scope of consent to remove organ presented a question of material fact
• reversing summary judgment because scope of consent to remove organ presented a question of material fact
• denying summary judgment after finding issue of material fact concerning good faith
• “[a] negligence standard is not used to determine whether good faith immunity will attach” under the UAGA
• “Good faith involves a factual inquiry, and the actor’s conduct must be judged in light of all the circumstances then present.” (citing Dutton v. Wash. Physicians Health Program, 943 P.2d 298, 302 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).