Satterfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insertion of the word “automatically’ in sentence concerning suspension of license did not alter substance of implied consent notice
• insertion of the word “automatically” in sentence concerning suspension of license did not alter substance of implied consent notice
• \[T]he implied consent statute does provide for the automatic suspension of a resident driver's license upon refusing the request to take the [s]tate's chemical test.\
• Officer’s “statement to Satterfield that his license would be automatically suspended, rather than merely saying that it would be suspended, left the substance of the implied consent notice unchanged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wallace v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-07-15· cited 10×
• State v. Fedrick
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-09-16· cited 2×
• Economos v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-25
• State v. Shawn Frederick
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-09-22
• The State v. Stroud.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-03-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Winnie
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-02-03· cited 33×