Skip to main content
· 11/28/2012

Satterfield v. Malloy

Citations

  • 484 B.R. 276
  • 700 F.3d 1231
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24550
  • 57 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 81
  • 2012 WL 5935951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the Barton doctrine is jurisdictional in nature”
  • refusing to recognize a general tort exception to the Barton doctrine
  • before suing a bankruptcy trustee in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, plaintiff was required to obtain permission from the bankruptcy court of that district
  • “We now hold that Barton precludes suit against a bankruptcy trustee for claims based on alleged misconduct in the discharge of a trustee’s official duties absent approval from the appointing bankruptcy court.”
  • “Regardless of the manner in which a plaintiff denominates his claim, courts applying the Barton doctrine must look to the substantive allegation to determine whether a claim is related to the trustee’s bankruptcy duties”
  • claims were subject to dismissal pursuant to the Barton doctrine because neither Barton exception was applicable to this case and it is “undisputed that [p]laintiff did not obtain leave from the bankruptcy court before filing suit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, O'Brien, Matheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.