Satterfield v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that use of truck to carry equipment to worksite did not cause worker acting as spotter to fall into open tank, because “presence of open tank (and the lack of adequate safeguards) was an independent, intervening, and unique cause of [worker’s] injuries”
• adopting this rule generally to insurance contracts in a case dealing with both the duty to defend and indemnify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).