Skip to main content
· 9/10/2014

Satkar Hospitality, Incorporat v. Fox Television Stations, Incor

Citations

  • 767 F.3d 701
  • 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1360
  • 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2413
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17489
  • 2014 WL 4441464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in a similar context, that \[t]he excusable-neglect standard can never be met by a showing of inability or refusal to read and comprehend the plain language of the federal rules.\ (citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • differentiating excusable neglect from plain neglect in the context of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)
  • \The excusable-neglect standard 'can never be met by a showing of inability or refusal to read and comprehend the plain language of the federal rules.'\
  • “Most important is the reason for the delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Sykes, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.