Skip to main content
· 4/28/2009

Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Citations

  • 968 A.2d 396
  • 291 Conn. 307
  • 2009 Conn. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that legislature knows how to expressly limit scope of court’s jurisdic- tion, and, if no intent to limit is expressed, then statute does not divest court of jurisdiction
  • \[a] court lacks discretion to consider the merits of a case over which it is without jurisdiction\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • addressing predicate assumption before addressing plaintiffs' ultimate claim on appeal
  • addressing predicate assumption before addressing plaintiffs’ ultimate claim on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.