SAS Group, Inc. v. Worldwide Inventions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In other words, the fact that [defendant’s] New York activities were sufficient to establish jurisdiction over the breach of contract claim does not mean that every cause of action that [plaintiff] may feasibly assert necessarily ‘arises from’ those activities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).