Skip to main content
· 5/17/1917

Sarusal v. Seung

Citations

  • 96 Wash. 295
  • 165 P. 116
  • 1917 Wash. LEXIS 603

Syllabus

<p>Master and Servant — Contract op Employment — 'Duration— Termination. The employment of plaintiff was for the duration of the job, and not from day to day, where he was to secure men to work for defendant on a salvage job, under his own foreman and timekeeper, and to receive for his services in securing and overseeing the men ten cents a day for each man while so employed, it appearing that the joh would require 260 to 300 men for fifty days, and that plaintiff was put to considerable expense in securing the men; hence defendant could not arbitrarily terminate the contract before completion of the job and refuse to pay for the men secured by plaintiff while they remained on the job.</p>

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.