Sartori v. Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the taxpayer never challenged the county’s judgment regarding the value of equipment, but only challenged the classification of the property, the taxpayer had four years within which to file, suit under section 197.182
• finding that the error in classifying Sartori's property was not subject to the sixty-day rule because it was tantamount to an error that could be corrected at any time under rule 12D-8.021

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).