Skip to main content
· 10/27/2008

Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd.

Citations

  • 167 Cal. App. 4th 1187
  • 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 506
  • 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “there is no horizontal stare decisis in the California Court of Appeal. This court — this panel — is not bound by [a prior Court of Appeal decision] and we may take a more critical approach to that opinion.” (emphasis in original) (citations omitted)
  • observing that it is logically fallacious to assume one event caused another merely because it preceded the other and that this logical fallacy cannot be deployed “to win a food poisoning case”
  • \there is no horizontal stare decisis in the California Court of Appeal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.