Skip to main content

Sartain v. State

Citations

  • 10 Tex. Ct. App. 651

Syllabus

<p>Sentence — Teem oe Impbisonment—Case Stated.— Upon a conviction for bigamy wherein the punishment assessed was one hour’s confinement in the penitentiary, sentence was pronounced against the accused. After one hour had expired, the accused, never having been incarcerated in the penitentiary, applied for his discharge under a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he was entitled thereto by virtue of art. 825, Code Crim. Proc., which provides that the term of imprisonment in a conviction for a felony shall commence from the time of sentence. Held, that notwithstanding the provision of the article referred to, the term of imprisonment of the accused could not commence until he is actually delivered to the penitentiary authorities, and placed in confinement inside of the penitentiary walls.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.