Sarmiento v. Montclair State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding legitimate reasons for not selecting the more experienced candidate because it was up to the university to evaluate which qualifications best fit departmental needs
• finding legitimate reasons for not selecting the more experienced candidate because it was up to the university to evaluate which qualifications best fit departmental needs
• finding \plaintiff's subjective belief he was more qualified for the job does not create an issue of fact for the jury\
• declining to impose spoliation sanctions where defendant presented evidence that interview notes were routinely destroyed and, in the present case, were destroyed promptly after the decision-making meeting, which was well before the plaintiff filed his EEOC complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).