Sarkar v. McCallin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating the judgment as if it were amended to reflect the district court’s clearly expressed intention
• “The First Amendment does not apply to speech that owes its existence to a public employee’s professional responsibilities.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).