Sargent v. Sargent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]n absolute prerequisite to judicial recognition of an out-of-state divorce is that the plaintiff must have resided in the ... country for a minimum period of residency” and “the residency be accompanied by ‘domiciliary intent’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lowenschuss v. Lowenschuss
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-09· cited 12×
• Rosen v. Sitner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 8×
• Cooper v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1974-04-24· cited 6×
• Cvitanovich-Dubie v. Dubie.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2010-04-12· cited 5×
• Gorso v. Bell Equipment Corporation
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-06-07· cited 5×
• Diamond v. Diamond
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-01· cited 4×
• Taylor v. Taylor
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 1990-12-12· cited 2×
• Hall v. Hall
  Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1983-04-22· cited 1×
• Miller v. Miller
  Columbia County Court of Common Pleas· 1976-10-25
• Griffith v. Hills
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-12-31
• Kalix v. Kalix
  Fayette County Court· 1985-02-27