Skip to main content
· 12/6/1966

Sargent v. Lady

Citations

  • 244 Md. 552
  • 224 A.2d 462
  • 1966 Md. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing denial of “a meaningful opportunity to be heard” in response to issuance of a PPO as a matter of “procedural due process”
  • the fact that a respondent’s status as having been convicted of sexually assaulting the petitioner satisfies the minimum requirements for issuing a PPO does not violate due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkbs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.