Skip to main content
· 10/15/1887

Sargent v. Eureka Spund Apparatus Co.

Citations

  • 53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 19
  • 11 N.Y. St. Rep. 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating paternity by estoppel continues to pertain in Pennsylvania, but it will apply only where it can be shown, on developed record, that it is in best interests of involved child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradley, Iiaight, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.